Newton Physics is now open source!
- Virion
- Halfling
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:06 am
- Location: Malaysia
- x 2
- jacmoe
- OGRE Retired Moderator
- Posts: 20570
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:13 am
- Location: Denmark
- x 179
- Contact:
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
*shocked*
Quite a decision.
From closed source to ZLib - quite a surprising change.
Quite a decision.
From closed source to ZLib - quite a surprising change.
Overhertz wrote:ehhh why the decision to go open-source?????
Julio Jerez wrote:Is not that what people are being asking for almost eight years now?
/* Less noise. More signal. */
Ogitor Scenebuilder - powered by Ogre, presented by Qt, fueled by Passion.
OgreAddons - the Ogre code suppository.
Ogitor Scenebuilder - powered by Ogre, presented by Qt, fueled by Passion.
OgreAddons - the Ogre code suppository.
-
- Ogre Magi
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: Finland
- x 5
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
The author probably realised that it's too much work for him to make money worth the effort out of the project...
-
- Gnoblar
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
reptor wrote:The author probably realised that it's too much work for him to make money worth the effort out of the project...
You must have a very narrow vision of other people's works, to judge it so quickly and from such a perspective.. From what i recall, there never was any intention to comercialize Newton.
The author stated on the forums that this way he can focus on coding the physics engine and have others take care for porting the library to different platforms.
- jacmoe
- OGRE Retired Moderator
- Posts: 20570
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:13 am
- Location: Denmark
- x 179
- Contact:
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
I think that was a very wise decision.
I am eager to see how Newton Physics develops.
I am eager to see how Newton Physics develops.
/* Less noise. More signal. */
Ogitor Scenebuilder - powered by Ogre, presented by Qt, fueled by Passion.
OgreAddons - the Ogre code suppository.
Ogitor Scenebuilder - powered by Ogre, presented by Qt, fueled by Passion.
OgreAddons - the Ogre code suppository.
- Kojack
- OGRE Moderator
- Posts: 7157
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- x 534
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
I just went to the newton forum, and my account has been deleted.
4 years of membership and contributing to a newton based student game which won the 2006 Game Connect Asia Pacific indie game contest (I wrote the newton to ogre wrapper they used).
Oh well. I didn't post much on there.
Newton has been pretty popular on iphone, open sourcing it should help a lot of alternative platforms (I haven't looked into how portable Bullet is to small systems like phones, pandora, etc).
4 years of membership and contributing to a newton based student game which won the 2006 Game Connect Asia Pacific indie game contest (I wrote the newton to ogre wrapper they used).
Oh well. I didn't post much on there.
Newton has been pretty popular on iphone, open sourcing it should help a lot of alternative platforms (I haven't looked into how portable Bullet is to small systems like phones, pandora, etc).
- betajaen
- OGRE Moderator
- Posts: 3447
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:15 pm
- Location: Wales, UK
- x 58
- Contact:
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
My account at Ageia get's deleted all the time.Kojack wrote:I just went to the newton forum, and my account has been deleted.
4 years of membership and contributing to a newton based student game which won the 2006 Game Connect Asia Pacific indie game contest (I wrote the newton to ogre wrapper they used).
This is good news though, it will make wrapping Newton a little easier, and less binding to Ogre for OgreNewt. You could probably replace the Vector classes in Newton with Ogre ones to save on conversion functions. That aside, it would be good to see it on the consoles, and mobile devices. I also think it would be good for Bullet, as both of them now can learn off each other.
Now, it'd be nice if PhysX became open source. But we all know that's never going to happen.
-
- Gnoblar
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
Kojack wrote:I just went to the newton forum, and my account has been deleted.
4 years of membership and contributing to a newton based student game which won the 2006 Game Connect Asia Pacific indie game contest (I wrote the newton to ogre wrapper they used).
Oh well. I didn't post much on there.
A lot of old inactive accounts there were purged recently due to old spammer accounts posting, this happens on practicall every forum..
- Kojack
- OGRE Moderator
- Posts: 7157
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- x 534
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
Yeah, my nvidia and ageia accounts are always being deleted (something like 1 month inactivity, which is annoying because it's taken up to 3 days to manually approve me again so I can download the latest sdk.
Havok doesn't have an account (for the free pc version at least), but if you don't make a bookmark to the download page then you have to keep registering emails with them.
I haven't even registered on the bullet forum (that I can remember).
I think I only had a couple of posts, so no real loss.
Havok doesn't have an account (for the free pc version at least), but if you don't make a bookmark to the download page then you have to keep registering emails with them.
I haven't even registered on the bullet forum (that I can remember).
I think I only had a couple of posts, so no real loss.
- mkultra333
- Gold Sponsor
- Posts: 1894
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 5:25 am
- x 114
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
When I was looking around at engines, I tried to join the Newton forum. For some reason, I was banned. Which was weird, because I'd never been there before and never posted anything. I sent them an email asking them to correct this, and got no response.
So I ended up using Bullet. I like Bullet, it always was open source. Some stuff in it annoys me, like the accuracy of straight line hit scans leaves something to be desired if used against convex hulls, and the experimental multi-threading had issues for me (wouldn't work properly with meshes, had to use convex hulls), but after a bit of tweaking I seem to have it functioning adequately. I really like the automatic interpolation, so I don't have to deal with any aliasing myself. From my limited use of the Bullet forum it was hit and miss, some posts answered straight away, some ignored, and it moves pretty fast. But then that's par for the course with programming forums.
People who used both engines, which do you think is better?
So I ended up using Bullet. I like Bullet, it always was open source. Some stuff in it annoys me, like the accuracy of straight line hit scans leaves something to be desired if used against convex hulls, and the experimental multi-threading had issues for me (wouldn't work properly with meshes, had to use convex hulls), but after a bit of tweaking I seem to have it functioning adequately. I really like the automatic interpolation, so I don't have to deal with any aliasing myself. From my limited use of the Bullet forum it was hit and miss, some posts answered straight away, some ignored, and it moves pretty fast. But then that's par for the course with programming forums.
People who used both engines, which do you think is better?
"In theory there is no difference between practice and theory. In practice, there is." - Psychology Textbook.
-
- Ogre Magi
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: Finland
- x 5
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
JernejL wrote:reptor wrote:The author probably realised that it's too much work for him to make money worth the effort out of the project...
You must have a very narrow vision of other people's works, to judge it so quickly and from such a perspective.. From what i recall, there never was any intention to comercialize Newton.
The author stated on the forums that this way he can focus on coding the physics engine and have others take care for porting the library to different platforms.
Of course I have a very narrow vision of other people's works. Thank you
- madmarx
- OGRE Expert User
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:26 pm
- x 50
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
I prefer Bullet. Mostly for performances reason. I suppose Newton was using too realistic physics when I did not really need them? noidea, but there are plenty of use for a physic engine, so the constraints (joke inside ) are different between projects.People who used both engines, which do you think is better?
Tutorials + Ogre searchable API + more for Ogre1.7 : http://sourceforge.net/projects/so3dtools/
Corresponding thread : http://www.ogre3d.org/forums/viewtopic. ... 93&start=0
Corresponding thread : http://www.ogre3d.org/forums/viewtopic. ... 93&start=0
- Kojack
- OGRE Moderator
- Posts: 7157
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:35 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- x 534
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
Yeah, it's hard to point to any one engine as definitely the best, since they are all quite different. They have different collision shapes (Havok has cylinders, PhysX doesn't), different joints (I think Newton had a corkscrew joint which Havok might have too, but nothing else does) and various other issues.
Then there's the api, Newton is based entirely on callbacks (which I don't like), Havok is painfully SSE obsessed (get used to vector math which looks like C rather than C++. Good for performance, but is annoying to use), PhysX needs that stupid driver crap otherwise it's dll won't start, etc.
The most feature filled one is Havok. The animation system alone is enough reason for it (full skeleton animation with physics interaction, skeleton retargetting, inverse kinematics, export tools, etc). Plus if you pay massive amounts of cash you can get Havok Destruction, Havok AI, Havok Behaviour and other bits. (The basic Havok physics and animation components are free for pc).
Then there's the api, Newton is based entirely on callbacks (which I don't like), Havok is painfully SSE obsessed (get used to vector math which looks like C rather than C++. Good for performance, but is annoying to use), PhysX needs that stupid driver crap otherwise it's dll won't start, etc.
The most feature filled one is Havok. The animation system alone is enough reason for it (full skeleton animation with physics interaction, skeleton retargetting, inverse kinematics, export tools, etc). Plus if you pay massive amounts of cash you can get Havok Destruction, Havok AI, Havok Behaviour and other bits. (The basic Havok physics and animation components are free for pc).
- syedhs
- Silver Sponsor
- Posts: 2703
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:24 pm
- Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- x 51
Re: Newton Physics is now open source!
My ip is banned too in www.newtondynamics.com. I have to use public proxy server to browse thru the website.
A willow deeply scarred, somebody's broken heart
And a washed-out dream
They follow the pattern of the wind, ya' see
Cause they got no place to be
That's why I'm starting with me
And a washed-out dream
They follow the pattern of the wind, ya' see
Cause they got no place to be
That's why I'm starting with me